Material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO-1)
During our DMA, we evaluated resource use and circular economy impacts across our value chain and products. We analysed industry risks such as raw material, energy, and water scarcity. Resource use and circularity topics were identified as material using the same methodology outlined in the Impact, risk and opportunities (IRO-1) section and this DMA process did not include consultation with affected communities.
The primary resource inflow for PUMA products is raw materials. Another one of PUMA’s major resource inflows is energy, identified as material topic and reported in the E1 Climate change. Chemical use and water usage are reported in the E2 Pollution and E3 Water and marine resources respectively, and the effect of our raw material usage on biodiversity is disclosed in the E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems. This section on resource inflows focuses exclusively on the materials used in PUMA products and product design.
The major outflows of PUMA’s value chain are our products (footwear, apparel and accessories) with their packaging. For other outflows, waste from our own operations and pre-consumer waste in the upstream value chain are reported in the resource outflows section while water pollution is reported in the E2 Pollution.
Own operations
Resource inflows and outflows are material topics for PUMA’s own operations. By integrating eco-design principles such as durability, modularity, and recyclability, PUMA can extend product life, reduce waste, and lower emissions, while also mitigating financial and regulatory risks linked to resource use.
Upstream value chain
Resource outflows are material topics for PUMA’s upstream value chain. Improper disposal of fabric waste can harm the environment, while circular practices like textile recycling help reduce landfill waste and reliance on new materials, supporting market and regulatory trends. In contrast, resource inflows, except energy and water use, which are addressed under E1 Climate change and E3 Water and marine resources sections, are not considered material upstream, as PUMA does not directly control raw material extraction. The environmental impacts of fibre production are instead addressed through biodiversity-related disclosures under E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems section.
Downstream value chain
Resource outflows are material for PUMA’s downstream value chain due to the environmental impacts associated with product disposal, particularly when items are incinerated or sent to landfill. These practices can release GHGs, microplastics, and other pollutants into air, water, and soil, contributing to climate change and ecosystem degradation. Resource inflows are not material for the downstream value chain, as PUMA does not consume new resources at the product use or end-of-life stage.
T.43Material resource use and circular economy-related impacts (IRO-1)
Value chain location ■□□ Upstream □■□ Own operations □□■ Downstream
Time horizon ❶⑤⑩ Short-term ①❺⑩ Medium-term ①⑤❿ Long-term Time horizon is indicated for potential impacts. If the impact is actual, marked with ●
Material topic
Material impacts, risks, and opportunities
Horizon
Location
Example (mitigation) measures
Resource inflows
POSITIVE IMPACTS
Circularity: Reduced landfill waste and lower demand for virgin fibres lead to conservation of natural resources, and decreased environmental pollution creating long-term benefits for ecosystems
●
■□□
• Policy implementation: Enforce the implementation of Environmental, Circularity, and Biodiversity policies
• Sourcing strategy: Implement responsible sourcing of raw materials
• Establishing targets and KPIs: In improving the implementation of the strategies and incorporating circular design criteria focusing on recyclability and durability
NEGATIVE IMPACTS
Environmental impact of inflow materials: The production of both natural and synthetic fibres can significantly harm biodiversity and ecosystems. Natural fibre cultivation often involves practices like monoculture, chemical use, and deforestation, while synthetic fibre production is energy-intensive and contributes to air, water, and soil pollution, including microplastic release. These impacts occur during fibre processing, where uncontrolled emissions and airborne particles further degrade environmental quality
●
■□□
FINANCIAL RISKS
Financial risks: Companies may face financial risks from regulatory penalties or public backlash if negative impacts occur during material production, while linear business models can drive up costs due to inefficient resource use and waste management
①❺❿
■□□
• Take-back and recycling schemes: Work on the collection of used products and streamline into recycling systems
• Textile-to-textile programme: Recycled from textile materials to be used in the products, such as RE:FIBRE
Regulatory risks: Stricter regulations like the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and mandatory environmental labelling are increasing in the EU. Companies that fail to comply with these rules risk facing financial penalties, higher compliance costs, and even restrictions on market access, especially for products with high environmental impacts
①❺❿
■□□
FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES
Market shifts to recycled materials: The global shift toward recycled materials presents financial opportunities for companies by lowering dependency on costly virgin resources, reducing environmental compliance risks, and aligning with consumer demand with preferences for products made with certified recycled materials, ultimately improving market competitiveness
①❺❿
■□□
Resource outflows
POSITIVE IMPACTS
Extended product life: Eco-design promotes circularity by using durable and modular materials and emotional durability concept, that extend product life and improve recyclability, which in turn reduces resource extraction, waste, and pollution, helping protect ecosystems and lower carbon emissions
●
□■□
• Research on biodegradable polymers: Support innovation in biodegradable materials to minimise long-term environmental impact
• Optimisation: Optimise production processes to reduce waste, like advanced cutting equipment
• Recycled material targets: Setting targets for materials including packaging
• Waste disposal: Secure standards for waste disposal in manufacturing companies, including sorting of waste, and managing contracts with waste handlers
NEGATIVE IMPACTS
Environmental impact: Post-production material waste and used products at their end-of-life may be incinerated or discarded in landfill, causing a negative environmental impact. Incineration releases GHG and toxic pollutants, while natural fibres decomposing in landfill emit methane. Both methods contribute to air, water, and soil pollution, ultimately damaging ecosystems and public health
●
■□■
FINANCIAL RISKS
Regulatory risks: Upcoming regulations such as the revised Waste Framework Directive and the ESPR pose financial risks to companies by potentially increasing costs through mandatory Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) fees and requirements like digital product passports for circularity, impacting compliance and operational expenses
①⑤❿
□■□
Strategy
PUMA’s strategy for resource use and circularity focuses on sourcing certified and recycled materials, improving resource efficiency, and promoting circular practices such as recycling and reuse throughout its value chain. The company aims to minimise waste, reduce reliance on virgin resources, and support initiatives that protect the environment.
Policies related to resource use and circular economy (E5-1)
The Management Board is responsible for the approval and implementation of the Circularity Policy. The policy has been agreed with internal stakeholders and reviewed by an external circularity organisation. Our policy is publicly available to potentially affected stakeholders and aims to support the transition to a circular economy as well as responsible consumption, and production and contribute to the SDGs. Various departments manage implementation of the policy and report progress to the Management Board and leadership team on a regular basis.
PUMA’s circularity policy outlines our commitment to advancing circularity across the value chain and aligns with the waste hierarchy of prevention, preparing for re‑use, recycling, other recovery, and disposal. By incorporating principles of circular design to create durable, repairable, and long-lasting products, PUMA contributes to prevention of waste and preparing for re-use. Incorporating more recycled materials in our products and our take-back schemes are our key recycling related actions. We also address other recovery by promoting water recycling in our upstream value chain while our commitment to eliminate landfill waste fulfils the disposal element of the waste hierarchy. However, the policy does not include detailed quantitative targets and specific procedures for each stage of the waste hierarchy, particularly regarding the management of residual waste for disposal.
Actions related to resource use and circular economy (E5-2)
The actions outlined below are already ongoing except for circular design principles. Specific actions and timeframes for circular design principles will be established in line with upcoming EU requirements.
Textile-to-textile recycling
To avoid fabric waste in our upstream and downstream value chain and reduce dependency on virgin raw materials and used PET bottles, we expanded our RE:FIBRE textile-to-textile recycling programme. Polyester, our most consumed technical material, is recycled into new textiles through the chemical and/or mechanical recycling of fabric waste and unsellable polyester items. We partner with football clubs like Manchester City or Borussia Dortmund, collecting used polyester products at fan shops. In 2025, we extended RE:FIBRE to cover jerseys of all major football clubs and federations, scaling up to over 9 million items.
Own operations
PUMA implements various initiatives to promote circularity. Through partnerships, PUMA seeks to improve material efficiency and reduce waste.
Innovation
In early 2025, PUMA started a multi-year collaboration with RE&UP to scale circular textile solutions globally. Building on PUMA’s RE:FIBRE program, the partnership will use recycling technology to transform textile waste, including complex blends, into recycled cotton fibres and polyester chips, thereby reducing reliance on virgin and bottle-recycled polyester.
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
The EU has proposed mandatory EPR for textiles by 2025, requiring separate collections and significant recycling or reuse efforts. PUMA contributed to packaging and product EPR schemes in 2025 for European countries such as Germany and the Netherlands.
Upstream value chain
Through supplier engagement and strengthened traceability requirements, PUMA aims to protect the environment and drive progress toward its circularity agenda.
Waste management
The Circular Fashion Partnership, launched by the Global Fashion Agenda (GFA) and GIZ coordinates brands, manufacturers, collectors, sorters, and textile recyclers to work together to segregate, digitally trace, and recycle textile waste into new products. PUMA joined this program in Vietnam and Cambodia in 2024 with continued participation in 2025.
Country of origin
PUMA tracks the country of origin of leather and cotton to understand possible environmental and human rights related risks. In 2025, we sourced approximately 28.7 thousand tonnes of cotton, with 77.4% of this coming from the USA, Brazil, and India. We require all cotton to be certified or recycled. We sourced approximately 7.5 thousand tonnes of leather, with 91.5% of this coming from the USA and Argentina. While suede traceability is more complex due to intermediaries, we monitor traceability from LWG medal-rated tanneries. This material consumption and country of origin information apply only to PUMA and excludes stichd.
Downstream value chain
Take-back schemes
PUMA rolled-out take-back schemes in selected markets, including the United States, the United Kingdom, China, India, France, Germany, Switzerland and Australia. The schemes support the collection of used textiles and footwear and enable selected items to be directed to recycling or reuse pathways through external partners, including within the RE:FIBRE programme. These initiatives contribute to the evaluation and development of circular solutions across different markets.
We also partnered with the shoe recycling company FastFeedGrinded for a footwear take-back project. As part of this initiative, 5,000 PUMA shoes were distributed in the Netherlands by FastFeedGrinded, then later collected and recycled to recover and repurpose the materials.
Consumer communication
Our communication strategy defines PUMA's brand positioning on circularity and outlines the behaviours we aim to encourage in consumers. We provide care and repair guidelines for consumers to help extend the lifespan of their products; the guidelines explain the most common reasons for discarding sportswear and provide simple tips to resolve these issues.
Products made of recycled or certified material
We focus on sourcing certified or recycled raw materials as per industry standards and certification schemes for cotton, polyester, leather, and cardboard, to reduce the environmental impact of our products. Details on impact and targets for biodiversity specifically are explained in E4 Biodiversity section.
To identify whether a product contains a significant share of certified or recycled raw materials, we developed the PUMA S-Index. For apparel and accessory items, a product is compliant with the PUMA S-Index if it contains at least 50% certified or recycled materials by weight. For footwear, one or more main components must be made from such materials.
Metrics and targets (MDR-M, MDR-T, E5-3)
In our Vision 2030 strategy, approved by the Management Board, we voluntarily set new targets in five circularity areas which are to be met between 2025 and 2030. These areas address the IROs identified as material for our business, helping to implement our Circularity Policy, such as taking responsibility for our products after use or reducing dependency on virgin raw materials by scaling up the use of recycled. Target achievement levels of the targets are monitored annually through material and product reports, dashboards or internal communication.
Stakeholder engagement was part of the target-setting process for each material sustainability matter. PUMA conducted materiality assessments and stakeholder consultations, including dialogue with suppliers, NGOs, industry experts, and investors to gather feedback and refine the targets, ensuring that both internal priorities and external perspectives were taken into consideration. Our circularity targets cover the production phase (recycled material usage), use phase (durability), and end of life (take-back and recycling). Targets related to inflows address the recycling element of waste hierarchy by increasing the use of recycled materials in products and packaging. Targets related to outflows address the prevention, recycling and disposal elements of waste hierarchy by minimising waste sent to landfill and recycling pre- and post-consumer waste.
Value chain location■□□ Upstream □■□ Own operations □□■ Downstream
10FOR25 target1
Location2
Scope
Entity specific
2020 baseline
2025 achievement
75% recycled polyester for apparel and accessories
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3
□
16.7% recycled polyester
89.0% recycled polyester for apparel and accessories
82.0% recycled polyester for all product divisions4
●
90% of apparel and accessories with certified or recycled material (at least 50% of product weight)
90% of all footwear contains at least one component made of certified or recycled materials
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3
□
81% apparel
47% accessories
24% footwear
90.6% apparel
58.5% accessories
96.1% footwear4
○
Set up or join product take-back schemes in major markets
□□■
PUMA
□
PUMA retail task force launched
Take-back schemes established in Australia, China, Germany, France, India, Switzerland and USA
●
Reduce production waste to landfills for footwear and apparel by at least 50% (core Tier 1 factories)3
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3
□
Apparel: 2.6 gr/piece
Footwear: 23.7 gr/pair
Apparel: –98.7% (0.03 gr/piece)
Footwear: –90.7% (2.2 gr/pair)5
●
Eliminate plastic bags from owned and operated PUMA stores
□■□
PUMA
□
400 tons of plastic bags used in PUMA stores
As of 1 January 2023, plastic bags are no longer used in PUMA's stores
●
Develop recycled material options for cotton, leather, rubber and polyurethane
■■□
PUMA
□
0.6% recycled cotton used; recycled leather and rubber used at pilot scale
21.8% recycled cotton
4.2% recycled rubber
0.7% recycled leather
4.0% recycled polyurethane4
●
Research biodegradable plastics options for products
■■□
PUMA
■
Internal circularity training and workshop; biodegradability standards introduced
RE:SUEDE experiment6
●
1 Targets are voluntary and not based on conclusive scientific evidence. The target related to waste to landfill is relative, all others are absolute. All targets apply from January 2020 to December 2025.
2 Targets apply to all locations of the entities listed in scope.
3 Cobra products sourced by PUMA Group Sourcing (PGS). Excluded are golf club parts sourced by Cobra PUMA Golf.
4 Material data includes material consumption (by weight) used in products, labelling, and packaging. 2025 data for PUMA, Cobra and stichd is collected from 712 core and non-core Tier 1 and Tier 2 factories. Primary data on material consumption is collected from January to October 2025 and data for November and December 2025 is estimated.
5 The data from October to December 2025 is extrapolated using error, trend and seasonality analysis from January to September 2025 data when data is continuously available within the given period. If the data are not continuously available between January to September 2025 due to the nature of waste disposal, then October to December 2025 is assumed as nil. 2025 data is from 19 core Tier 1 apparel and 18 core Tier 1 footwear.
6 Test for biodegradability completed and results are publicly shared.
The 10FOR25 targets for recycled polyester were fully achieved with a rate of 89.0% for apparel and accessories and 82.0% for all product divisions due to advances in technology and scalability of recycled polyester in our industry. However, when looking at to all recycled or certified materials, we only achieved our 10FOR25 goal for apparel and footwear (while accessories fell short of the goal at 58.5%). There are remaining challenges for accessories due to the nature of the product and availability of certified material to fulfil the products’ functionality or quality requirements. Take-back schemes have been established in major markets, and we will continue to evaluate future expansion plans in existing or other markets.
With respect to waste in our upstream value chain, production waste sent to landfills dropped significantly by 98.7% for Tier 1 apparel and 90.7% for Tier 1 footwear in 2025 as compared to the 2020 baseline. This reduction surpassed the original target of 50% for both divisions. As for plastic bags, we had achieved our goal as we have not used plastic bags in PUMA stores since 2023. We also achieved our goals for the development of recycled materials for cotton, leather, rubber and polyurethane as we had recycled content in all these four materials in 2025. We also achieved our goal on biodegradable alternatives for plastic with the RE:SUEDE products.
T.45Vision 2030 targets and baseline
Value chain location ■□□ Upstream □■□ Own operations □□■ Downstream
Vision 2030 target1
Location2
Scope
Entity specific
2025 baseline
Establish circular design criteria focusing on recyclability, durability, and repairability based on industry standards
□■□
PUMA
□
No criteria
Define specific targets for products adhering to circular design criteria
□■□
PUMA
□
No targets
100% of polyester fabric used is recycled polyester
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3, stichd4
□
82.0% PUMA & Cobra
25.7% stichd6
30% of the recycled polyester fabric used for apparel products is fibre-to-fibre recycled polyester
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3, stichd4
□
11.5% PUMA & Cobra
6.0% stichd6
20% of the cotton fabric used for apparel products is recycled cotton
■□□
PUMA, Cobra3, stichd4
□
22.0% PUMA & Cobra
3.5% stichd6
Research and invest into next-generation material options with a focus on footwear
■■□
PUMA
□
No research
Provide access to consumers to re-sell or repair business models in selected markets
□□■
PUMA
□
No re-sell or repair
Increase consumer communication to raise awareness on circularity5
□□■
PUMA
□
No communication
Post-consumer waste: Collaborate with industry peers on sorting and recycling solutions, taking EPR schemes into consideration
□□■
PUMA
□
Current engagement with industry organisations
Pre-consumer waste: Partner with industry associations, suppliers, and selected governments in sourcing countries to establish ways of recycling material waste
■□□
PUMA
□
Involved the Circular Fashion Partnership in Cambodia and Vietnam with GIZ and GFA
100% unavoidable plastic packaging is made from recycled content
□□■
PUMA, Cobra3, stichd4
□
91.2% PUMA & Cobra
20.8% stichd6
Eliminate plastic packaging where technically and economically feasible
□□■
PUMA, Cobra3, stichd4
□
No baseline
1 Targets are voluntary, absolute, and not based on conclusive scientific evidence. They apply from January 2026 to December 2030.
2 Targets apply to all locations of the entities listed in scope.
3 Cobra products sourced by PUMA Group Sourcing (PGS). Golf club parts sourced by Cobra PUMA Golf are excluded.
4 stichd will finalise their company-level 2030 targets in 2026.
5 Measured by the number of initiatives per year. Increase refers to there being zero initiatives in the baseline year.
6 Material data includes material consumption (by weight) used in products, labelling, and packaging. 2025 data for PUMA, Cobra and stichd is collected from 712 core and non-core Tier 1 and Tier 2 factories. Primary data on material consumption is collected from January to October 2025 and data for November and December 2025 is estimated.
2025 performance serves as a baseline for all Vision 2030 targets; no specific progress was planned for 2025. Whether progress is in line with the planned target will be analysed from 2026 onwards.
Resource inflows (E5-4)
For biological materials, PUMA uses mainly cotton and leather (the latter as a by-product of the meat industry) along with natural rubber, paper and cardboard for packaging and office purposes. Preferred biological materials are sourced according to standards such as the Better Cotton Initiative, Leather Working Group, Global Recycled Standard and Recycled Claim Standard. For PUMA products in 2025, 99.5% of cotton came from certified (BCI, organic or regenerative) or recycled sources. For paper and carboard, we also accept the Forest Stewardship Standard. Although man-made cellulosic fibres (MMCF) are not a material inflow due to its volume of consumption, 92.5% were sourced from FSC/PEFC-certified or “green shirt” rated suppliers like Lenzing (EcoVero®), avoiding the use of wood from endangered forests.
In terms of animal-based materials, 99.3% of leather came from LWG-certified tanneries with gold ratings, while recycled leather reached 0.7%. Wool use totalled 1 tonne with 95.2% RWS-certified. All down feathers used were RDS-certified or recycled.While animal welfare is not classified as a material topic for PUMA, and wool and down are also deemed non‑material because of their limited use, we aim to uphold responsible practices by encouraging the use of certified or recycled sources for animal‑based materials.
For technical materials, PUMA mainly uses polyester, polyurethane, synthetic rubber and EVA for the soles of shoes. The Global Recycled Standard and the Recycled Claim Standard are used to certify recycled content. In 2025, 87.5% of polyester was either bluesign®, OEKO-TEX® certified, recycled, or bio-based.
Elimination of single-use plastic
As part of the implementation of our 10FOR25 targets, PUMA has taken measures to reduce single-use plastics across retail, logistics, and office operations, including replacing consumer-facing plastic bags, transitioning to recycled or certified alternatives for selected materials and packaging, and eliminating single-use plastics in offices.
T.46Resource inflows (in T) (E5-4)1
2025
2024
Amount
%
Amount
%
Biological materials2
Paper and cardboard
45,413
49.9%
48,381
48.0%
Cotton
35,490
39.0%
44,321
44.0%
Leather
7,510
8.3%
5,746
5.7%
Natural rubber
1,769
1.9%
1,458
1.4%
Others
825
0.9%
830
0.8%
Total weight of biological materials
91,007
100.0%
100,736
100%
Sustainably sourced biological materials2 (%)
95.3%
96.9%
Technical materials3
Polyester
53,875
37.6%
53,867
36.8%
Synthetic rubber
45,069
31.5%
45,373
31.0%
Polyurethane
18,122
12.7%
17,555
12.0%
EVA
16,693
11.7%
18,164
12.4%
Others
9,452
6.6%
11,583
7.9%
Total weight of technical materials
143,210
100.0%
146,542
100%
Total weight of materials
234,217
247,278
Secondary materials45
Recycled polyester
42,466
78.8%
38,730
71.9%
Recycled cardboard
43,108
94.9%
36,034
74.5%
Recycled cotton
6,505
18.3%
5,073
11.4%
Other recycled materials
5,514
5.9%
5,159
5.1%
Total weight of secondary materials
97,593
84,996
Secondary materials (%)
41.7%
34.4%
1 Material data includes material consumption (by weight) used in products, labelling, and packaging. 2025 data for PUMA, Cobra and stichd is collected from 712 core and non-core Tier 1 and Tier 2 factories. Primary data on material consumption is collected from January to October 2025 and data for November and December 2025 is estimated.
2 Biological materials with GRS/RCS or FSC or GOTS or OCS certification, Better Cotton license, leather sourced from LWG certified tanneries. The calculation does not currently consider the application of the cascading principle for biological materials. Biofuels used for non-energy purposes are not included in the calculation of sustainably sourced biological materials. If applicable, this will be updated in future disclosures.
3 Technical materials including virgin and secondary materials.
4 Percentage recycled material by material type.
5 Data on secondary reused or recycled components and intermediary products are not included, as required. Only secondary materials are reported.
To obtain the data on inflow materials, PUMA provides training to its suppliers on material consumption data reporting. A material consumption data questionnaire is sent to PUMA’s Tier 1 and Tier 2 supplier factories, who report the types of materials used in PUMA products along with the corresponding certifications recognised by PUMA. Suppliers then upload the completed questionnaire for data consolidation. The material team validates the data based on the usage confirmed at the development stage to avoid mistakes such as data duplication. Full-year data is accounted for using the actual material weight data from January to September and extrapolating the planned material shipments (as of 30 September) that will be delivered between October and December. This extrapolation assumes that orders placed after the end of September will be delivered within the same year. Packaging material weight data is collected from January to September and extrapolated based on previous year data.
Resource outflows (E5-5)
Products and packaging
The main output of PUMA’s outsourced production process are footwear, apparel and accessories. In the absence of a clear definition or industry standard on the basis of which materials or components can be considered recyclable, we are unable to report a precise figure for the recyclable content of footwear and accessories products. In general, footwear, apparel and accessories are currently not recycled at scale after their use.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no universally mandated standards specifically for the durability of footwear, apparel or accessory products. PUMA has an internal quality management system to maintain product quality. We are currently awaiting the finalisation of the ESPR on durability standards for footwear and apparel. Once these regulations are established, we plan to update our durability standards.
At PUMA, we do not offer a formal repairability service for our products. However, our products are made to be repairable in normal tailor repair shops, for example, broken stitches or buttons. To extend the life of products, we offer guidance on product care and washing to our consumers on with RE:HACKS initiative.
For the primary packaging of our goods, we use paper and cardboard for shoe boxes, as well as polyethylene bags for apparel and accessories. Both our shoeboxes and the polybags (excluding stichd) used for product packaging use over 90% recycled input materials and are also recyclable after use. The majority of our shoeboxes are made from 100% cardboard and our polybags from 100% polyethylene. Therefore, depending on the recycling method used, both packaging items are recyclable, except for the colours used for printing on the surface of the box and the bag.
Waste
Own operations
Waste from our own operations relates to packaging waste (cardboard and plastic) from PUMA’s owned and operated warehouses and stores, as well as paper and general waste from PUMA’s office locations. We require our own operations to recycle waste wherever possible by setting internal waste recycling targets.
T.47Waste generation in own operations (in T) (E5-5)1
2025
2024
Non-hazardous waste prepared for reuse
5.2
3.3
Non-hazardous waste sent to recycling
4,022
4,483.7
Total non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal
4.027
4,487.0
Hazardous waste prepared for reuse
0.0
0.0
Hazardous waste sent to recycling
3.3
4.4
Total hazardous waste diverted from disposal
3.3
4.4
Total waste diverted from disposal
4,030.5
4,491.4
Total waste diverted from disposal (%)
73%
66%
Non-hazardous waste sent to incineration
564
1,269.1
Non-hazardous waste sent to landfill
625
852.4
Non-hazardous waste sent to other disposal2
225
116.7
Total non-hazardous sent to disposal
1,414.4
2,238.2
Hazardous waste sent to incineration
56.8
0.9
Hazardous waste sent to landfill
0.0
2.7
Hazardous waste sent to other disposal
0.2
34.0
Total hazardous waste sent to disposal
57.1
37.6
Total radioactive waste
0.0
0.0
Total waste sent to disposal
1,471.5
2,275.8
Total waste sent to disposal (%)
27%
34%
Total waste
5,502.2
6,767.2
1 Data on waste generation is collected using primary data (approx. 50%) and estimations (approx. 50%). Where primary data is available and does not cover the full reporting year, the data is extrapolated to 12 months. Where primary data is not available, the data is either estimated based on sites with similar properties or on average data calculated considering the number of employees on the site. PUMA does not apply other recovery operations in its own operations, as waste is either prepared for reuse, recycled or sent to disposal, with no further recovery processes in place.
2 Disposal method of other disposal was selected when method of final disposal was different from incineration or landfill or could not be identified.
Upstream value chain
Although we do not currently set absolute reduction targets for waste generation among our core supplier factories, we continue to collaborate with them to strengthen waste management systems and increase diversion from disposal, particularly avoiding landfill. These efforts include partnerships such as those with GIZ and GFA, as highlighted in the Actions related to resource use and circular economy (E5-2) section.
T.48Waste generation in upstream value chain (in T) (E5-5)1
2025
Non-hazardous waste prepared for reuse
539.8
Non-hazardous waste sent to recycling2
28,089.2
Total non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal
28,629.0
Hazardous waste prepared for reuse
92.0
Hazardous waste sent to recycling
736.6
Total hazardous waste diverted from disposal
828.6
Total waste diverted from disposal
29,457.6
Total waste diverted from disposal (%)
82.6%
Non-hazardous waste sent to incineration
2,414.4
Non-hazardous waste sent to landfill
404.4
Non-hazardous waste sent to other disposal3
2,256.3
Total non-hazardous sent to disposal
5,075.0
Hazardous waste sent to incineration
950.7
Hazardous waste sent to landfill
58.7
Hazardous waste sent to other disposal
124.4
Total hazardous waste sent to disposal
1,133.8
Total waste sent to disposal
6,208.8
Total waste sent to disposal (%)
17.4%
Total waste
35,666.5
1 Data on waste generation are collected using primary data from January to September 2025 and estimated for October to December 2025 from 79 core Tier 1 and 43 core Tier 2 from PUMA, Cobra and stichd.
2 Disposal method of recycling includes recycling into other product (within and/or outside our value chain) and energy recovery process done in third party with boiler and co-processing with other feedstock.
3 Other disposal was selected when final disposal method was different from incineration or landfill or could not be identified.
Of the total waste generated, non-hazardous waste (94.5% of total waste) has a higher rate of diversion from disposal at 84.9% (primarily boiler ash, fabric waste, and paper and cardboard) as compared to hazardous waste. Due to stricter regulations and limited disposal options mandated by authorities, a higher proportion of hazardous waste was sent for disposal (57.8%), primarily by incineration (83.9%), to minimise potential harm to the environment and human health. Only 42.2% of hazardous waste (mainly boiler ash, empty chemical containers, and other hazardous materials) was diverted from disposal as being reused or recycled. Due to the nature of the manufacturing process in our industry, we did not have any radioactive waste in our upstream value chain in the current reporting year as with the previous years.
In 2025, we expanded our waste data collection to include rubber, EVA, leather, and PU, as compared to only fabric in previous years. These materials represent the key material waste generated in our upstream value chain. These material wastes are generated mainly from the cutting process. From a total material waste of 16,051.1 tonnes of total material waste, 12,323.3 tons (76.8%) were diverted from disposal like reused (2.7%) and recycled (74.1%), 1,943.0 tonnes(12.1%) were sent to incineration, and 1,617.5 tonnes(10.1%) had an undefined disposal pathway. 167.2 tons(1.0%) of material waste were sent to landfill due to limitations of local waste management infrastructure. This data allows us to better understand the opportunities for improvement that are specific to each material type.
This site uses tracking technologies from various providers
This site uses third party website tracking technologies to provide and continuously improve its services and display advertisements according to users' interests. Our cookie banner allows users to choose between three options. Until he confirms the banner, the scripts for statistics and marketing cookies will not be executed. I agree and can withdraw or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
Functional – Basic website functions require this cookie, it is needed and cannot be deselected.
Statistics – Tracking services for the collection of user statistics.
Marketing – Cookies from third-party services that collect data on the website and merge it with your own data.