ENVIRONMENTAL KEY PERFORMANCE DATA

During 2021 we revisited the methodology of our PUMA Environmental Profit and Loss Account, or EP&L. The methodology, which was developed in 2011 by PWC and Truecost, and later further refined by Kering with the help of PWC, mainly relies on material input and spend data.

During our review, we realized that many savings made by our Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers had not been captured by the EP&L methodology, and for some of our major materials used, such as Better Cotton, no specific EP&L emission factors have been developed.

Therefore, we decided to pause the publication of our EP&L for 2021 and rework the methodology to more accurately reflect our environmental performance in the future.

This work has now progressed, so that we are sharing our EP&L results in accordance with the new methodology for 2020, 2021 and 2022.

However, we are still in the process of fully aligning our EP&L methodology for Tiers 3 and 4 with internal and external standards. As a result, the table below differs from our Scope 3 emission calculation in the Climate section and also results in a high water value for Tier 3 due to some wet processing for leather and polyester being attributed to Tier 3.

We will further work on the alignment of methodologies to strengthen the EP&L as a valuable risk assessment and information tool.

G.37 EP&L RESULTS 2022
G.38 EP&L TREND 2020 – 2022

As in previous years, we are also reporting the underlying datasets as Environmental Key Performance Indicators in this chapter.

T.35 E-KPIS - PAPER

Paper1-4 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 % change 2021/2022 % change 2017/2022
Paper and cardboard consumption PUMA (tons)* 5,021 4,152 2,638 2,281 2,292 2,756 21% 82%
Certified or recycled paper and cardboard consumption PUMA (tons) 4,393 3,306 1,848 1,818 1,120 2,025 33% 117%
Percentage of certified or recycled paper consumption (%) 87% 80% 70% 80% 49% 74%    
Paper and cardboard consumption from PUMA production (shoe boxes, hangtags) (tons) 30,656 19,670** 18,538 14,863 13,607 14,129 55.8% 116.8%
Percentage of certified or recycled paper and cardboard consumption from PUMA production (%) 99% 88%** 99% 100% 98% n/a    
*
Including paper bags, office paper and cardboard consumption
**
Including outer cardboard boxes
1.
PUMA figures include PUMA owned or operated offices, warehouses and stores. Includes our own production sites in Argentina. All other production is outsourced to independent supplier factories, some warehouse operations are outsourced to independent logistics providers. Franchised stores are excluded.
2.
PUMA production figures include Core T1 supplier factories, Apparel, Footwear & Accessories (62 factories) and Core T2 supplier factories, Leather, PU and Textiles (43 factories).
3.
Data includes extrapolations or estimates where no real data could be provided.
4.
Methodological changes over the last three years have influenced results.
T.36 E-KPIS PUMA – ENERGY

Energy (MWh)1-3 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 % change 2021/2022 % change 2017/2022
Total energy from electricity 75,269 67,866 61,365 61,499 66,512 64,119 11% 18%
Non-renewable electricity consumption 0 0 0 12,683 29,766 52,508 - -100%
Electricity consumption from renewable sources (green tariffs and on-site photovoltaics) 15,697 13,749 10,839 11,547 11,695 11,611 14% 35%
Percentage of renewable electricity consumption (excluding EACs) 21% 20% 18% 19% 18% 18%    
Electricity consumption guaranteed with EACs 59,572 54,117 50,526 37,269 25,051 0 10% n/a
Percentage of renewable electricity consumption (including EACs) 100% 100% 100% 79% 55% 18%    
Total energy from non-renewable fuels (oil, natural gas, etc.) 7,541 10,006 10,739 10,975 11,724 14,430 -25% -48%
Total energy from district heating 5,483 10,795 6,247 7,915 5,734 5,155 -49% 6%
Total energy consumption (PUMA own entities) 88,293 88,666 78,350 80,389 83,970 83,704 0% 5%
1.
Figures include PUMA owned or operated offices, warehouses and stores. Includes our own production sites in Argentina. All other production is outsourced to independent supplier factories, some warehouse operations are outsourced to independent logistics providers. Franchised stores are excluded.
2.
Data includes extrapolations or estimates where no real data could be provided.
3.
Methodological changes over the last three years have influenced results.
T.37 E-KPIS PUMA TIER 1 & TIER 2 PRODUCTION - ENERGY

Energy (MWh)1 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 % change 2020/2022
PUMA production (Tier 1)2              
Non-renewable energy consumption from PUMA production (Tier 1) 292,459 331,199 221,641 246,160 195,866 194,881 34.6%
Renewable energy consumption from PUMA production (Tier 1) 37,322 17,763 3,013     294 1,144%
Percentage of renewable energy consumption from PUMA production- including I-REC 11.3% 5% 1%     0.2% 731.1%
PUMA production (core Tier 2)3              
Non-renewable energy consumption from PUMA production (core Tier 2) 744,940 795,673 607,310     586,986 22.7%
Renewable energy consumption from PUMA production (core Tier 2) 90,333 39,317 3,393     524 2,562.7%
Percentage of renewable energy consumption from PUMA production- including I-REC 10.8% 5% 0.6%     0.1% 1,846.8%
1.
Data includes extrapolations or estimations where no real data could be provided.
2.
Core T1 supplier factories, Apparel, Footwear & Accessories (62 factories)
3.
Core T2 supplier factories, Leather, PU and Textiles (43 factories).

In line with our 10FOR25 target to achieve 25% share renewable energy for core Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers, we have set a goal of 10% renewable energy share for 2022. The share of renewable energy consumption by Tier 1 suppliers increased from 5% in 2021 to 11.3% in 2022. This is mainly achieved due to participation of the core suppliers in renewable energy projects, followed by installation of rooftop solar facilities and purchase of energy attribute certificates by the core Tier 1 suppliers. Although the share of renewable energy for Core Tier 2 suppliers has marginally increased in 2022, PUMA has purchased energy attribute certificates on behalf of its Tier 2 suppliers located in Vietnam to achieve the renewable energy target of 10%.

T.38 A E-KPIS PUMA – WASTE AND WATER

Waste and Water1-3 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 % change 2021/2022 % change 2017/2022
Total waste (tons) 4,991 5,215 3,949* 3,644* 4,877 5,293 -4% -6%
Recycled waste (tons) 3,007 2,220 1,436* 1,603* 2,282 3,419 35% -12%
Recycled waste (%) 60% 43% 36% 44% 47% 65%    
Total water (m3) 147,227 116,829 96,569 89,676 95,291 106,397 26% 38%
Public network consumption (m3) 143,332 116,829 96,569 89,676 95,291 106,397 23% 35%
Rainwater consumption (m3) 3,895              
*
Waste data for PUMA’s own entities in 2019 and 2020 recalculated due to underreporting in these years
1.
Figures include PUMA owned or operated offices, warehouses and stores. Includes own production sites in Argentina. All other production is outsourced to independent supplier factories, some warehouse operations are outsourced to independent logistics providers. Franchised stores are excluded
2.
Data includes extrapolations or estimations where no real data could be provided
3.
Methodological changes over the last three years have influenced results
T.38 B E-KPIS PUMA CORE TIER 1 & TIER 2 PRODUCTION – WASTE AND WATER

Waste and water1 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 % change 2020/2022
PUMA production (Tier 1)2              
Waste from PUMA production (Tier 1 suppliers, tons) 34,642 33,806 23,498 24,205 16,682 14,686 47.4%
Percentage production waste to landfills (Tier 1) 12.9% 10% 9%       36.3%
Water from PUMA production Tier 1 suppliers (k m3) 2,551 2,706 2,332 2,572 2,030 2,149 9.4%
PUMA production (core Tier 2)3              
Waste from PUMA production (core Tier 2 suppliers, tons) 19,025 8,689 5,968     17,138 218.8%
Percentage production waste to landfills (core Tier 2) 4.0% 9% 18%       -77.3%
Water from PUMA production (core Tier 2) (k m3) 5,956 5,769 4,796     280 24.2%
1.
Data includes extrapolations or estimations where no real data could be provided.
2.
Includes core T1 supplier factories, Apparel, Footwear & Accessories (62 factories).
3.
Includes core T2 supplier factories, Leather, PU and Textiles (43 factories).

Though we did not have any goals for absolute reduction in waste generation and water consumption from our core suppliers, we continue to track them. We can see that there is a 47% increase in production waste for Tier 1 suppliers and 218% from Tier 2 suppliers from 2020. This is mainly due to the improvement in waste data captured by the suppliers. Certain waste such as residual ash from coal and biomass boilers that were not captured by the Tier 2 suppliers earlier are now included. We also added nine new core factories for textile, which have not yet been engaged in cleaner production programs. At the same time, the production volume has increased by 33% for textiles and 62% for synthetic leather.

Similarly, in 2022 absolute water consumption marginally increased by 9% for Tier 1 suppliers and the same increased by 24% for Tier 2 suppliers as compared to the baseline of 2020. This is mainly due to an increase in production volume. If we compare the KPIs, water per pair of shoes has been reduced by 36% and for apparel it has been reduced by 17% per piece of garment. Therefore, we achieved our goal of a 6% reduction in the water KPI from 2020. Similarly, for leather the water KPI has been reduced by 17% and for textile, it has been reduced by 4.7%. For textile, we are marginally short of achieving our 2022 goal and hence we are going to focus more on water reduction from textile factories in 2023 and in the coming years. Water recycling plants implemented in 2022 by some of the large textile suppliers will have an impact from 2023 onwards.

PRODUCT-RELATED E-KPIS

Since 2017 we have also measured the average environmental key performance indicators (E-KPIs) from textile and leather manufacturing (Tier 2) and apparel and footwear manufacturing (Tier 1).

In 2022 the greenhouse gas emission KPIs have been reduced across the product divisions except for textiles, where they have slightly increased by 1.6% as compared to 2020. CO2 emissions per pair of shoes have been reduced by 5%, by 14% per piece of garment and by 14% per square meter of leather.

This is mainly achieved due to various climate actions initiated as described in this report. The participation of core suppliers in cleaner production and renewable energy programs, the installation of rooftop solar projects and the purchase of IRECs are the main contributors for these reductions achieved in greenhouse gas emissions.

T.39 FOOTWEAR E-KPI RESULTS (T1)

Summary of supplier e-KPIs     Weights Change  
Value 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2020-2022 Number of suppliers
Energy/pair (kWh) 1.36 1.41 1.31 1.30 1.25 1.40 4% 21
CO2/pair (kg) 0.7 0.68 0.74 0.96 0.93 1.00 -5% 21
Water/pair (l) 9.62 11.95 15.08 15.21 12.3 14.50 -36% 21
Waste/pair (g) 133.94 140.88 144.80 126.66 108.51 115.90 -8% 21
Waste to landfills/pair (g) 12.33 19 24       -48%  
T.40 APPAREL E-KPI RESULTS (T1)

Summary of supplier e-KPIs     Weights Change  
Value 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2020-2022 Number of suppliers
Energy/piece (kWh) 0.52 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.72 -6% 26
CO2/piece (kg) 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.31 -14% 26
Water/piece (l) 3.83 4.23 4.60 4.39 4.20 7.58 -17% 26
Waste/piece (g) 58.18 62.33 54.27 56.33 46.50 44.00 7% 26
Waste to landfills/piece (g) 2.66 2.4 2.6       1%  
T.41 LEATHER E-KPI RESULTS (T2)

Summary of supplier e-KPIs     Weights Change  
Value 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2020-2022 Number of factories
Energy/m2 (kWh) 7.5 6.5 7 8.2 8.7 9.1 7% 5
CO2/m2 (kg) 2.3 1.9 2.7 3.2 3.2 3.4 -14% 5
Water/m2 (l) 56.9 60.9 68.3 74.7 90.2 91.8 -17% 5
Waste/m2 (g) 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.6 -12% 5
T.42 TEXTILES E-KPI RESULTS (T2)

Summary of supplier e-KPIs     Weights Change  
Value 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2020-2022 Number of factories
Energy/t(kWh) 13,122.5 13,393.6 13,049.1 12,636.3 13,386.80 13,679.11 1% 34
CO2/t (kg) 4.54 4.58 4.47 4.37 4.45 4.45 1.6% 34
Water/t (l) 98.47 98.7 103.4 105.5 122.78 119.30 -4.7% 34
Waste/t (g) 288.5 121.38 78.9 62.08 70.63 299.59 266% 34